Gendered Memories of War and Political Violence: Women and the war story
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Iranian state’s ideological constructions of the Iran-Iraq War, have been prolific. These constructions have taken the shape of popular culture, film and theater, literature, as well as sights and events of commemoration, as part of the Iranian state’s War Story. My aim is to unpack how this story is told, how collective memory is shaped, and what some of its implications are in terms of women’s learning in conflict zones. The Iran-Iraq War was the longest military conflict of the 20 th century, and an important stepping ground in the formation of Iran’s theocratic state. Women were assigned a special role in the war during which the idea and model of “Muslim woman” was constructed and propagated. In shaping the collective memory of the nation, the Iranian state’s narrative in memorializing the Iran-Iraq War has served as a powerful and potent tool in legitimizing the theocratic regime’s rule. . By exploring the Islamic Republic of Iran’s cultural-nationalism project, within the particular socio-historical context of the Iran-Iraq War, my goal is to locate and analyze the creation of an ideal woman of an Islamic nation - ‘Muslim Woman’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".