MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1502618581 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2015.7167073

Parallel gradient-based local search accelerating particle swarm optimization for training microwave neural network models

2015· article· en· W1502618581 on OpenAlexaff
Jianan Zhang, Kai Ma, Feng Feng, Qi‐Jun Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationArtificial neural networkComputer scienceMessage Passing InterfaceMicrowaveMulti-swarm optimizationLocal search (optimization)Process (computing)AlgorithmSpeedupMathematical optimizationParallel computingMessage passingArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel global optimization technique for training microwave neural network models. Unlike existing sequential hybrid algorithms, the proposed technique implements parallel gradient-based local search in particle swarm optimization (PSO). The whole swarm is divided into subswarms for multiple processors. The particle with the lowest error in the subswarm in each processor is chosen to do further local search using quasi-Newton method. This process is performed in all the subswarms in parallel using the message passing interface (MPI). The proposed technique increases the probability and speed of finding a global optimum. This technique is illustrated by two microwave modeling examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.123 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207