MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Acceso de las personas con VIH al sistema de salud colombiano y sus costos relacionados desde una perspectiva individual y familiar, Bogotá, 2010

2011· article· es· W1502693335 on OpenAlexaff
Mónica María Lopera-Medina, Jorge Martínez-Escalante, Thomas Ray-Einarson

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PhilosophyFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Con el objetivo de explorar el acceso a 10s servicios de salud para Ia población con VIH en Bogotá y 10s costos asociados se diseñó un protocolo mixto. Este incluyó una fase cuantitativa, de corte transversal, con una muestra por conveniencia de 540 adultos con VIH, y una fase cualitativa, con perspectiva fenomenológica con 20 pacientes. El 95% de Ia muestra estaba afiliada al SGSSS; sin embargo, se encontraron fallas estructurales y operativas que constituyen barreras a Ia atención integral, así como procesos dispendiosos para Ia exigibilidad de 10s derechos. Los costos directos mensuales asumidos por Ias personas con VIH o sus familias eran de $65.000, Io que representa entre el 11 y el 16% de sus ingresos. Los costos indirectos eran 2,2 veces mayores. El acceso a 10s servicios de salud inciden en el impacto psicofisico y aumentan Ia carga de enfermedad en términos de costos directos e indirectos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions→French-language works237,207→