Switchable power converters for multiple input voltage level power factor correction applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, two switchable power converters, integrated SEPIC/boost and flyback/boost, are described, analyzed and designed for power factor correction applications with multiple line input voltages (e.g. 120 Vrms and 277 Vrms). The range-selection switch can configure the converter to boost topology at low line input voltages, and to SEPIC or flyback topology at high line input voltage. As a result, the output DC voltage can be set to an intermediate level for overall power conversion efficiency improvement and system cost reduction. boundary conduction mode (BOM) is considered for both topological configurations for the following benefits, 1) Near resistive input characteristics; 2) Smaller inductor sizes compared with continuous conduction mode (CCM); 3) Lower switch current stress compared with discontinuous conduction mode (DCM); and 4) Simple controller. Analytic and experimental results showed that the component current stresses and losses in the switchable converters are significantly lower than those in conventional SEPIC or flyback converters. It is also shown that it is possible to share the same power stage components and the same control IC in the switchable converters with guaranteed absolute stability
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".