MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1502785712 · doi:10.1088/0026-1394/39/2/12

EUROMET Project 432: Frequency performance of 12 906   and 6453   reference resistors for ac quantum Hall effect experiments

2002· article· en· W1502785712 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J Boh cek

Bibliographic record

VenueMetrologia · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistorBifilar coilResistive touchscreenElectrical engineeringPhysicsMaterials scienceEngineeringCurrent (fluid)Voltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Czech Technical University (CTU), acting as pilot laboratory in an international comparison, has fabricated and provided as transfer standards four terminal-pair thermostatted travelling resistance standards with nominal values of 12906 Ω and 6453 Ω. Vishay S 102 K resistors form the resistive elements of these standards and 100 Ω platinum resistance thermometers make it possible to monitor their inner temperature. The laboratories participating in the comparison (five in Europe and one in Canada) were requested to measure the frequency dependences and time constants of the travelling standards by comparing them with resistors with calculable frequency performance. Calculable resistors of several different designs (monofilar, bifilar, quadrifilar and octofilar) were available. For both travelling standards, the ac-dc differences of the parallel equivalent resistance, as reported by the different laboratories, are within 13 parts in 108 at 500 Hz and 70 parts in 108 at 5000 Hz. The reported time constants differ by less than 3.9 ns and 4.8 ns, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetrologiaSame topicAdvanced Electrical Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207