MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1502817972 · doi:10.1159/000331195

Radiosurgery after Craniotomy

2012· review· en· W1502817972 on OpenAlexaff
David Mathieu

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in neurological surgery · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiosurgeryCraniotomyMedicineAdjuvant radiotherapyRadiation therapySurgeryNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adjuvant irradiation of the resection cavity after craniotomy is a newer application of stereotactic radiosurgery. This technique has been proposed to avoid long-term neurotoxicity of whole-brain radiation therapy, and seems to afford comparable local control rates in the multiple published retrospective series so far. Currently, many questions remain to be answered to define the optimal patients who are candidate for tumor bed radiosurgery. The optimal timing after craniotomy, the volume of tissue to include in the treatment isodose and the radiation dose required to provide long-term local control are parameters which remain controversial at the moment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in neurological surgerySame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207