Diversidad y complejidad en el fenómeno de las drogas: el policonsumo simultáneo en estudiantes universitarios en una universidad, Cundinamarca - Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El policonsumo simultáneo de sustancias psicoactivas es un tópico que diversifica y complejiza el fenómeno de las drogas en nuestra sociedad contemporánea. Se realizó un estudio cuantitativo transversal, con el propósito de describir los patrones de policonsumo simultáneo de sustancias psicoactivas, con una muestra de 975 estudiantes de pregrado de las carreras relacionadas con el área de la salud, en una Universidad en Cundinamarca, Colombia. Se observó un alto reporte de estudiantes que realizan policonsumo simultáneo, destacándose la combinación de alcohol + tabaco. Se evidenciaron comportamientos diversos del policonsumo, relacionados con la edad de inicio, el reporte del momento del consumo, el año académico cursado, las sustancias empleadas y la transición del consumo al policonsumo simultáneo. Se sugiere incluir este tópico en la formación de recursos humanos en salud y en el desarrollo de investigación.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".