Methodologie de transformation du cim en pim dans l'approche mda
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Object Management Group (OMG) has proposed a new software development approach called Model Driven Architecture (MDA). This approach focuses on developing models of the highest level of abstraction and supports the transformation approach from one model to another. MDA advocates the development of three types of models: Computation Independent Model (CIM): this model represents the highest level of abstraction. It describes the system requirements and the environment in which it will operate while the details of the software structure and realisation are hidden or not yet determined. Platform Independent Model (PIM): this model describes the details of the system, but does not show details of the use of its platform or of a particular technology. Platform Specific Model (PSM): this model describes the details and features absent from the PIM. It must be adapted to specify the implementation of the system in a single technology platform. As these different types of models represent various levels of abstraction of the same system, MDA recommends the use of transformation mechanisms allowing the transformation of the CIM to PIM and the PIM to PSM. Since the advent of MDA, many research studies have addressed the issue of transforming the PIM to PSM and PSM to code, but very few deal with the transformation of the CIM to PIM. Although the literature presents some work related to this issue, it seems that few researchers have studied the problems related to the transformation of the CIM to PIM. The CIM was originally considered an integral part of the PIM. Although the concept of independence of the platform is quite clear, the notion of the concept Computation remains unclear. Therefore, the boundary between CIM and PIM models also remains vague. In order to transform the CIM to PIM, we have identified three research issues: 1) the definition of the architecture of the CIM to define its borders with the PIM, 2) the definition of the architecture of the PIM to define its borders with the PSM, 3) the definition of a methodology to transform the CIM to PIM. This thesis contributes to the field of model driven engineering. More specifically we propose for this end: 1) an architecture of the CIM based on the composition of three models Business Motivation Model (BMM), Business Process Model (BPM) and Requirement Model (RM), 2) an architecture of the PIM based on analysis patterns and archetype patterns, 3) a methodology covering all creation steps of the CIM and the techniques and artefacts to produce it or them, allowing the transformation of the CIM to the PIM. A contribution of this work is to improve the traceability between CIM and PIM, as well as bridging the gap between the activities of the business analysts and of the software architects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".