The Effect of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Changes on the Cognitive State of Patients With Parkinson’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article has been retracted by the authors. Background: Recent data have revealed that cognitive involvement occurs, more or less, in every stage of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (IPD), which is definitely going to cause radical changes in this traditional understanding. The effects of blood pressure changes during the night on the cognitive states of patients with IPD are not known for sure. The purpose of this study was to research the effects of blood pressure changes during the night on cognitive state of patients with IPD. Methods: A total of 30 patients, 14 females and 16 males, were followed with a diagnosis of IPD. Cognitive functions were assessed with an extensive neuropsychological test battery. Results: The fifth stage of Stroop test, test of line direction, test of face recognition and Hooper test were significantly different in dipper group when compared with the non-dipper group. Conclusion: Not having nocturnal blood pressure decrease in IPD can be accepted as a risk factor in terms of cognitive function disorders. J Neurol Res. 2015;5(3):207-212 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jnr324w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".