Étude biomécanique du traitement de la scoliose idiopathique par orthèse: effets des paramètres de conception des corsets sur les corrections géométriques et sur les contraintes internes du rachis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Je voudrais remercier mes directeurs de recherche, le Dr Carl-Éric Aubin, le Dr Hubert Labelle et le Dr Stefan Parent pour m"avoir permis de travailler sur ce projet et pour m"avoir encadré.J"ai apprécié l"autonomie qu"ils m"ont accordée, leur sens critique et leur rigueur.J"aimerais également remercier mes collègues du Laboratoire Informatique de Scoliose 3D (LIS3D), notamment Younes Madjouline, les frères Driscoll, Nadine Lalonde, Archana Sangole, Christian Bellefleur, pour les conseils qu"ils m"ont donnés et leur sens du travail d"équipe.Je remercie les gens avec qui je vis.Ce travail de recherche a été financé par l"Institut de recherche en santé du Canada (IRSC), le Conseil de recherches en sciences naturelles et en génie du Canada (CRSNG), et le Programme des chaires de recherche du Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".