MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1503411352

Inhabitable Spaces in Claire Harris’s She

2009· article· en· W1503411352 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Veronica Austen

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)Representation (politics)PoetryConstruct (python library)Function (biology)Subject (documents)HegemonyColonialismSociologyHistoryAestheticsLiteratureComputer scienceLawArtPhilosophyLinguisticsPoliticsWorld Wide WebPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Claire Harris’s poetry has proven remarkable not only for its eloquence and its challenging subject matter but also for its use of a visually experimental form. In Harris’s She, the visually experimental form is used to perform the protagonist’s pursuit of a non-constrictive space, where she can function as a productive adult. Constructing herself as the marks on the page rather than the creator of those marks – the written instead of the writer – Penelope reveals that the page does not ultimately offer her the welcoming space she seeks. She is left wondering, “i am fiction / so who writes me?” The hegemonic imperial control of language renders it impossible for Penelope to write herself on a clean slate. Rather than a space where she can freely construct a representation of herself and her experiences of colonialism and immigration, the blankness of the page is infused with her sense of lost history and loss of self.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0280.040
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207