MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1503512675

Trading Aprons for Arms: Feminist Resistance in the North of Ireland

2003· article· en· W1503512675 on OpenAlex
Theresa O’Keefe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNationalismEmancipationIrishGender studiesResistance (ecology)SociologyFeminismEthnologyPolitical sciencePoliticsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines women's feminist resistance under the rubric of nationalism. It challenges the commonly held assumption that participation in nationalist movements is not self-serving for women, that fighting in a national liberation movement is detrimental to women's emancipation. It accounts for the rise of feminist-nationalist organizing in the North of Ireland, and its impact on the most radical element of Irish nationalism--republicanism. It argues that women's participation in the armed struggle empowered republican women to develop and advance a progressive, feminist agenda in conjunction with republicanism. This analysis is primarily based on interviews conducted with former female members of the Irish Republican Army. Cet article examine la resistance feministe dans le cadre du nationalisme. Il defie la conception generalement acceptee selon laquelle la participation dans des mouvements nationalistes ne servirait pas la cause des femmes et la lutte pour une liberation nationale contredirait l'emancipation des femmes. Il evalue la croissance d'une organisation feministe et nationaliste en Irlande du Nord, et son impact sur le republicanisme, l'element le plus radical du nationalisme irlandais. L'analyse est en majeure partie basee sur des entrevues avec des femmes ayant ete membres de l'armee republicaine irlandaise. ********** Nationalism as Oppressive to Women Since the early 1980s, when the field of women and nationalism started to gain prominence, feminists have been seeking to determine the extent to which nationalism is an oppressive force in women's lives. Their studies provide an understanding of how violence employed in conflict in the form of mass rape, abuse, torture and murder, is most often directed at women. (1) To a lesser extent, feminist scholars have also surveyed women's participation as combatants in national struggles. (2) What each approach has in common is a desire to understand the implications of nationalism for women. The former has explored how women's bodies become the terrain over which armed struggles are fought. The latter generally emphasizes how women, despite active participation, are rarely afforded equal status within nationalist movements. Each approach has been critical to our understanding of how women are implicated in (or by) the nationalist project. Not as cogently understood, however, is women's feminist resistance within such nationalist struggles. Feminism still lacks a solid understanding of women's organizing against patriarchy in the context of nationalism. Despite the fact that nationalist movements are often self-proclaimed liberation movements, much of feminist scholarship has equated nationalism with a retreat from the struggle for women's emancipation. Nationalism, it has been argued, asks women to put their emancipation project on hold until the national issue is resolved. Female combatants in nationalist struggles throughout the world are often asked to prioritize struggles, because the nationalist cause is the most temporally pressing and other issues should be dealt with after the revolution is won. As Cynthia Enloe explains: Repeatedly, male nationalist organizers have elevated unity of the community to such political primacy that any questioning of relations between men and women inside the movement could be labeled as divisive, even traitorous. Women who have called for more genuine equality between the sexes ... have been told that now is not the time, the nation is too fragile, the enemy is too near. Women must be patient, they must wait until the nationalist goal is achieved; then relations between women and men can be addressed. Not now, later, is the advice that rings in the ears of many nationalist women. (3) Furthermore, once the national question is addressed, the argument goes, women are still left out in the cold as it is still patriarchal power that rules the day; there is little evidence to suggest that when later actually arrives the concerns of its female membership are ever contemplated. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it