MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1503538173

« Consommer la mobilité » en Bulgarie postsocialiste (1990-2000) : sujets et objets

2002· article· fr· W1503538173 on OpenAlexaff
Dessislav Sabev

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielle · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesConnotationPolitical scienceSociologyEthnologyArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analysing the social connotation of material consumption among the newly rich in Bulgaria, this article examines the dynamics of postsocialist identity. The material object is regarded as a means of expression for the newly rich individual to establish an identity within the new social context. Principal purchases — the house and car—must materialize the individual's success. However, these objects create a contradiction between the modernity of global mobility, and the sense of belonging to a place that stems from the perpetuation of local traditions. It is the family, where the most material investment is made, that must reconcile social mobility with cultural continuity. Resume Analysant la connotation sociale de la consommation materielle des nouveaux riches en Bulgarie, cet article vise la dynamique identitaire postsocialiste. L'objet materiel est aborde comme moyen d'expression de l'acteur lors de son interaction avec le nouveau contexte social. Les premiers objets d'investissement - la maison et la voiture - doivent materialiser la reussite individuelle. Ils expriment cependant une identite contradictoire, oscillant entre la modernite d'une mobilite mondialiste et une appartenance locale geree par des valeurs traditionnelles. C'est la famille, lieu privilegie d'investissement materiel, qui doit reconcilierla mobilite sociale et l'ancrage culturel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielleSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207