MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Progressive sensorimotor impairment is not associated with reduced dopamine and high energy phosphate donors in a model of ataxia‐telangiectasia

2004· article· en· W1503541089 on OpenAlexaff
Howard T.J. Mount, Jean‐Claude Martel, Paul Fluit, Ying Wu, Eleanor Gallo‐Hendrikx, Cristina Cosi, Marc Marien

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDopamineMonoamine neurotransmitterStriatumAtaxia-telangiectasiaDopaminergicEndocrinologyInternal medicineDopamine transporterNeuroscienceBiologySerotoninMedicineBiochemistryDNA damage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) is a genetic disease, associated with progressive motor impairment and a lack of functional ATM protein. It has been reported that immunoreactive tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine transporter are reduced in an Atm-/- mouse model of A-T. These observations led to a hypothesis that A-T is associated with loss of nigrostriatal dopamine and prompted the launch of clinical trials to evaluate a therapeutic utility of the anti-parkinsonian drug, l-DOPA. To test for dopamine depletion more directly, we measured regional levels of monoamines and their metabolites in the Atm-/- mouse brain. We also measured levels of NAD+, a cofactor for dopamine biosynthesis and substrate of the DNA damage surveillance enzyme, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Constitutive activation of PARP has been posited to cause NAD+ depletion. We observed no reduction in monoamine transmitters and no depletion of NAD+, or other high energy phosphate donors in the adult Atm-/- cerebellum, striatum, or ventral mesencephalon. However, our studies did reveal a progressive sensorimotor impairment in Atm-/- mice that may serve as a relevant proxy for progressive neurological impairment in the human disease. Our results call into question the involvement of dopamine in A-T and the therapeutic strategy of enhancing dopaminergic function with l-DOPA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207