Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prenant pour point de départ le film vidéoLakota Quillwork, Art and Legend(Jane Nauman, 1990), cet article propose une réflexion sur la fabrication du sacré et, plus précisément, sur les réappropriations subies par la figure de la Femme double dans la culture lakota. Ce personnage apparaît central aussi bien historiquement qu’ethnographiquement, et il est toujours présent dans les pratiques visionnaires, artistiques, ainsi que dans les discours des brodeuses autochtones. L’analyse suit le personnage de la Femme double comme un révélateur possible des définitions et valeurs successives accordées à la féminité au sein des cultures des Plaines et des Prairies. Incarnant l’ambiguïté des rôles féminins, cette figure a ainsi changé de régime de valeur au fil des contextes socio-historiques. Elle fut notamment associée à Marie durant la période d’évangélisation des communautés autochtones. Enfin, face aux recompositions de l’espace social et familial, l’auteure interroge les résonances contemporaines que pourrait avoir cette figure émancipatrice auprès des femmes amérindiennes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".