MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1503671122 · doi:10.1364/jocn.7.000885

Analysis of Low-Bit Soft-Decision Error Correction in Optical Front Ends

2015· article· en· W1503671122 on OpenAlex
Monireh Moayedi Pour Fard, Glenn Cowan, Odile Liboiron-Ladouceur

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Optical Communications and Networking · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsDecoding methodsComputer scienceError detection and correctionFront and back endsNoise (video)Code (set theory)Bit error rateElectronic engineeringAlgorithmEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel methodology for analyzing the advantageous decoding performance of multibranch configurations of low-bit optical soft-decision forward error correction receivers is presented. The decoding performance and noise behavior of three front-end schemes are evaluated and compared. Arising from a multiple-branch configuration, the concept of inconsistency in the decoder (thermometer code) is presented and used to optimize decoding performance. The experimentally validated methodology considers both optically amplified long-haul and short-reach applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it