Telehealth support system for evaluation of continuous positive airway pressure treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a telehealth system for the support and evaluation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea (OSAH). The Web-based system supports the patients in the initial months of the CPAP therapy, especially, the patients from remote areas with limited access to specialized clinics. The system has four major functions: (1) to facilitate patient's education and communication with the clinic, (2) to collect and store subjective self-reported data, physiologic information, and objective CPAP usage data, (3) to analyse patient's compliance, and (4) to assess effectiveness of CPAP treatment. The telemedicine system consists of four modules: (1) a Web-based interface for the patients and health practitioners, (2) a database system for self-reported data, physiologic information, objective CPAP usage data (downloaded from the machine), and patient's records, (3) an analytical system for measuring the compliance, and (4) a rule-based system for the evaluation of effectiveness of CPAP treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".