MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1503705026 · doi:10.1002/9781118444832.ch26

The Rare Ones: Horner's Syndrome, Complications from Surgical Positioning and Post‐Sternotomy Complications

2012· other· en· W1503705026 on OpenAlexaff
Lukas Kus, Jeremy L. Freeman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryAnhidrosisPtosisHorner syndromeAnisocoriaMiosisLiposuctionMedian sternotomyThyroidectomyThyroidAnesthesiaPupil

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Every endocrine surgeon will encounter rare thyroid surgery complications over the course of their career which are important to recognize. This chapter discusses several such complications, namely Horner's syndrome, complications from intraoperative positioning and sternotomy complications. Horner's syndrome is defined as an injury to the sympathetic nervous system causing ipsilateral eyelid ptosis, pupillary miosis and anhidrosis. This phenomenon can result from an iatrogenic injury during thyroidectomy. Incorrect intraoperative positioning is a preventable error that may lead to the formation of pressure ulcers and peripheral nerve injuries. Head extension during surgery can also have serious consequences in some patients. Sternotomy is the splitting of the sternum in order to achieve better access to the mediastinum and its contents. In thyroid surgery, this is usually performed in cases of large retrosternal goitres or thoracic thyroid cancer metastases. Complications related to sternotomy include sternal malunion, wound dehiscence and infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207