MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1503820313 · doi:10.7202/016838ar

Le rapport entre la musique contemporaine vénézuélienne dite « savante » et les musiques populaire et folklorique

2007· article· fr· W1503820313 on OpenAlex
Alfredo Rugeles

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCircuit Musiques contemporaines · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Culture and Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, le compositeur et chef d’orchestre Alfredo Rugeles montre que le rapport entre la musique contemporaine dite savante et les musiques populaire et folklorique est une réalité bien concrète au Venezuela. Après avoir rappelé les principaux jalons de l’histoire de la composition en son pays, l’auteur cite de nombreux exemples de collaboration entre compositeurs de musique savante et interprètes de musique populaire. Il dresse la liste des principaux compositeurs du Venezuela, les regroupant selon leur appartenance à une génération, à une école ou à un courant stylistique. Il brosse également le tableau de la situation actuelle en plus de répertorier les différentes maisons d’enseignement et professeurs auprès desquels les jeunes compositeurs reçoivent leur formation ainsi que les différents festivals où leurs oeuvres sont présentées au public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it