MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1504153893 · doi:10.3130/aija.73.457

CONSERVATION PRESSING TASK AND NEW DOCUMENTATION OF OLD TUBE HOUSES IN HANOI OLD QUARTER THROUGH THE CASE OF NO. 47 HANG BAC STREET HOUSE

2008· article· en· W1504153893 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
To Kien

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Crisis of the 21st Century
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)HangDocumentationTask (project management)ArtVisual artsEngineeringHistoryArchaeologyComputer scienceMechanical engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hanoi is the oldest capital city in Southeast Asia. During its long urban evolution, indigenous cultural elements gradually formed up that are best found in its Old Quarter. With regard to architecture, “tube house” should be the most significant dwelling form here. Under strong urbanization and modernization processes within the last decade, many tube houses has been being torn down for new constructions or at least seriously downgraded and much modified. Thus, it has become a pressing task to conserve those precious tube houses, especially oldest and most originally remained ones, then to restore or renovate them as historic monuments for future generations' as well as foreign references. This paper generally discusses on the more pressing task to conserve invaluable tube-houses, then focuses on describing existing situations and finally publishes the latest complete documentation (as of Sept. 2006) of the chosen study case: the 47 Hang Bac house.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)Same topicFinancial Crisis of the 21st CenturyFrench-language works237,207