MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Postmenopausal Women with DCIS Post-Mastectomy: A Potential Role for Aromatase Inhibitors

2012· review· en· W1504318646 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rowan T. Chlebowski, Nananda F. Col

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Breast Journal · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExemestaneMedicineLetrozoleAnastrozoleBreast cancerTamoxifenAromataseOncologyMastectomyAromatase inhibitorInternal medicineCancerGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For postmenopausal women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) where optimal local control or patient preference results in mastectomy, despite substantial risk of contralateral invasive breast cancer, tamoxifen is uncommonly prescribed based on unfavorable risk-benefit consideration. In the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trial Group (NCIC CTG) MAP.3 primary prevention trial, in postmenopausal women exemestane reduced invasive breast cancer incidence by 65% without increasing life-threatening side effects. In adjuvant breast cancer trials, the aromatase inhibitor exemestane as well as anastrozole and letrozole have all reduced new contralateral breast cancer incidence. Thus, aromatase inhibitors, and perhaps particularly exemestane, provide an option to address the risk of contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with DCIS managed with mastectomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Breast JournalSame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207