Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à explorer la notion d'identité narrative de Paul Ricoeur dans le cadre d'une réflexion théorique sur les technologies de communication, et plus spécifiquement internet. Il s'agira de s'interroger sur la validité conceptuelle de la notion d'identité narrative dans une analyse des usages d'internet. Si le rapport à soi est médié chez Ricoeur par les ressources de l'histoire racontée, le rapport à cette histoire suppose des formes préalablement instituées. Dans ce cadre, le rapport institué entre l'usager et sa machine suppose de s'interroger sur les possibilités de s'appuyer sur le concept d'identité narrative pour définir ces pratiques. Cet article ne prétend pas étudier les usages proprement dits d'internet mais vise à questionner l'adéquation théorique d'une notion susceptible d'être mobilisée dans les études sur les usages d'internet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".