MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1504358037 · doi:10.7202/1012357ar

Une lecture dialogique de l’improvisation libre et collective en musique actuelle et en contact-improvisation

2012· article· fr· W1504358037 on OpenAlex
Sophie Stévance

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de la Société québécoise de recherche en musique · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesImprovisationArtPhilosophyVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose une analyse de l’improvisation en musique actuelle , un courant musical d’avant-garde qui s’est développé au Québec en 1979, à la lumière du contact-improvisation (mouvement chorégraphique apparu aux États-Unis en 1972). L’objectif est de comprendre la nature de ces arts improvisés où le rapport avec autrui en est le fondement. Comment l’individu et l’autre agissent-ils l’un sur l’autre? Comment prennent-ils la place qui leur revient dans le cadre d’un même processus conversationnel en cours? Le dialogisme selon Bakhtine, ici considéré comme métaphore, permet d’illustrer les interactions en jeu dans la musique actuelle et le contact-improvisation. Le dialogisme offre également l’occasion d’interroger la notion d’improvisation libre et collective, dont la musique actuelle et le contact improvisation sont les dignes représentants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0090.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it