MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W150437283 · doi:10.4401/ag-5493

Osservazioni limnografiche sul lago di Albano

2011· article· it· W150437283 on OpenAlexaff
P. CALOI, G. ROMUALDI

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Geophysics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)Range (aeronautics)AmplitudeGeologyClimatologyPhysicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper reports the results of a series of limnographicsurveys, carried out at different times on the lake of Albano, in order tocompare the characteristics of free oscillations of the lake, calculated theoretically,with the real ones.The results have shown, as in the case of other Italian lakes, a verygood agreement between theory and observation, both as to the periodsand as to the range between the two extremes. In conformity with Hidaka'stheory, the uninodal amplitude at the Northen extreme of the lake (inhabitedside) appears to be four times highers than that which is noticed on theopposite side.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of GeophysicsSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207