MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1504460508

Navigating and Negating the Ownership Fallacy in Edward P. Jones’ The Known World

2012· article· en· W1504460508 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chelsea Wiksyk

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œalbatross · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCaribbean history, culture, and politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFallacyAutonomyMainstreamPower (physics)NarrativeSociologyEnvironmental ethicsPolitical scienceEpistemologyLawLiteraturePhilosophyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In his novel, The Known World, Edward P. Jones postulates that slavery is a mutually enforced system based in the ‘ownership fallacy.” As a result, he avoids the mainstream discussion of slavery as a power imbalance. Instead, he drives at the ethical issues lurking beneath this well-known inequity, insisting that the principles of autonomy and respect necessary for avoiding oppressive social systems are inadequately understood. The plethora of characters and relationships Jones depicts in his complex narrative serve to facilitate the sincere critical analysis he finds lacking in citizens of all nations, creeds, and colours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.046
Scholarly communication0.0090.010
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œalbatrossSame topicCaribbean history, culture, and politicsFrench-language works237,207