MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1504690206 · doi:10.1002/9781118492185.ch2

Forecasting Logistics Requirements

2013· other· en· W1504690206 on OpenAlexaff
Gianpaolo Ghiani, Roberto Musmanno

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicQuality and Supply Management
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemand forecastingMatching (statistics)Operations researchComputer scienceVariable (mathematics)JudgementEconometricsLagIndustrial engineeringEconomicsEngineeringStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forecasting is an attempt to determine in advance the most likely outcome of an uncertain variable. Planning and controlling logistics systems need predictions for the level of future economic activities because of the time lag in matching supply to demand. Logistics requirements to be predicted include customer demand, raw material prices, labour costs and lead times. Qualitative methods are mainly based on expert judgement or on experimental approaches, although they can also make use of simple mathematical tools to combine different forecasts. This chapter describes the main forecasting method when the demand pattern displays a constant or linear trend and a seasonal variation with periodicity M. It outlines some advanced forecasting techniques. Controlled Vocabulary Terms logistic distribution

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuality and Supply ManagementFrench-language works237,207