MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1504813672 · doi:10.1002/0470869143.kc043

Perennial Plants as a Production System for Pharmaceuticals

2004· other· en· W1504813672 on OpenAlexaff
Marc‐André D’Aoust, Ursula Busse, Michèle Martel, Patrice Lerouge, Damien Levesque, Louis‐Philippe Vézina

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTransgenic Plants and Applications
Canadian institutionsMedicago (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerennial plantProduction (economics)PopulationTransformation (genetics)BiotechnologyProtein expressionBiologyBiochemical engineeringBotanyEngineeringGeneEconomicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For molecular farming applications, the capacity to transform perennial plants for recombinant protein production gives access to stable and almost perpetual production of pharmaceuticals from a single population of plants. Being able to produce a bioactive protein with a uniform and well characterised population not only reduces production costs but more importantly, it ensures even and predictable production rate of a uniform product from a genetically stable population. Despite their promising potential, two main hurdles hindered the early development of perennial plant‐based expression systems: the lack of adapted expression cassettes and the difficulty to genetically transform and regenerate the best‐suited perennials. This chapter describes recent scientific breakthrough in alfalfa transformation and protein expression and purification that opened the way to the development of an efficient recombinant protein production platform using alfalfa as bioreactor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransgenic Plants and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207