MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1504877082

Occupational Disruption and Resumption: Leisure Experiences of 'Immigrant Women'

2006· article· en· W1504877082 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationLabour economicsPsychologyPolitical scienceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding leisure as an occupation requires as examination of leisure definitions, the various contexts and conditions that support or impede leisure, and meanings that arise from leisure participation. Social scientists who contribute to leisure studies conceptualize leisure as time, activity, context, and subjective experience and their research focuses on one or more of these features. The analytic lenses that scientists use to study leisure range from the personal and psychological to broader sociological perspectives that encompass cultural, economic and institutional phenomena and reveal the complexity of leisure. The conceptual and practical problems of leisure occupations are raised through the present research question: How does the process of resettlement in Canada influence the ways in which women understand and participate in leisure? Ethnographic, feminist and critical theory traditions formed the methodological underpinnings of this qualitative research, and guided analytic and ethical decisions. In-depth interviewing, conducted in English, was the main data collection method. Interview questions created a comprehensive picture of daily and weekly occupations. The recruitment of participants occurred primarily through community resettlement programs. The purposeful sample comprised 14 highly-educated women from nine countries who were married and had children living at home. Participants’ ages ranged from 31 – 56 years old and prior to immigration they had careers as teachers, engineers, psychologists, systems analysts, social workers, and designers. Thematic analysis revealed that social, material and temporal circumstances influenced disruptions to leisure and helped explain situations in which leisure occupations resumed. Diminished time and social support, career changes and gendered domestic activities all contributed to women’s understanding and participation in leisure. One theme, Orchestrating the Day, revealed how the process of resettlement changed the activities and time spent in mothering and homemaking roles, leaving fewer opportunities for leisure. Another theme, Socializing is the Key to Leisure, provided an explanation of participants’ resistance to disruption in their leisure occupations, and identified opportunities to resume or recreate new leisure occupations. These findings highlight the importance of studying not only the meaning that individuals attach to self-defined leisure but also how environmental influences shape participation in leisure occupations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it