MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1504989332 · doi:10.7202/016578ar

Laure Conan à l’épreuve du livre de piété

2007· article· fr· W1504989332 on OpenAlex
Marie-Andrée Beaudet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hybrides, faisant largement appel aux genres de l’intime, les premiers textes de Laure Conan échappent aux catégories instituées du littéraire. L’hypothèse qui guide la présente relecture d’ Un amour vrai (1879), « À travers les ronces » (1883) et Angéline de Montbrun (1884) est que l’oeuvre de Laure Conan s’est construite à la croisée des champs littéraire et religieux, et qu’elle doit une large part de son inspiration et de ses particularités formelles à l’influence des livres de piété français qui ont nourri l’imaginaire social de la seconde moitié du dix-neuvième siècle au Québec. L’oeuvre de Laure Conan, du moins dans ses premières manifestations, serait à prendre à la lettre, c’est-à-dire comme une contribution destinée à nourrir la ferveur des croyants et à susciter des conversions. Paradoxalement, cette hétéronomie aura favorisé l’expression d’une subjectivité indissociablement sociale et littéraire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it