Composite spectra: XVIII HR 6497, a triple system containing a baffling double secondary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present a full description of, and parameters for, the component stars in the triple‐lined composite‐spectrum system HR 6497. Both the outer and the inner orbits have already been computed with fair accuracy, but the improved orbits resulting from this new analysis have precisions that are up to an order of magnitude tighter. By applying the proven technique of spectral subtraction to a large sample of new, high‐quality spectra we separate the spectra of the inner pair cleanly for the first time, and show that it has characteristics which cannot be explained at all easily by conventional models. Since the inner pair are separated by only 4 times their own radii, we expect their rotations to be synchronized to their orbital revolution, or close to 28 km/s, but in fact they have almost no visible rotation at all. The Mg II line at λ 4481 Å, itself a close doublet with a separation of 0.2 Å, is clearly resolved in the spectra of both components of the inner system. Such resolution is extremely rare in our experience, and we are unable to suggest a satisfactory explanation for it (© 2012 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".