MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1505436675 · doi:10.56105/cjsae.v17i1.1869

The Marginalized Role of Non-formal Education in the Development of Adult Education

2003· article· en· W1505436675 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdult educationFormal educationSociologyInformal educationGender studiesPedagogyHigher educationEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1998, James Draper challenged adult educators in the introduction to his chronology to build on his chronology and to ask questions of history that might help us to understand the influence that "learning has had in directing and enriching the development of individual men and women." This paper attempts to respond to that challenge and provide an explication of the development of adult education in context: the context being the historical and social developments of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries with special attention and examination of the developments in and marginalization of non-formal adult education. The social, religious, philosophical and historical context of non-formal adult education demonstrates the contextual framework embedded in adult education and reveals a movement of voluntary organizations that have carried on massive non-formal educational endeavours. Résumé En 1998, dans l'introduction de sa chronologic, James Draper a mis au défi les formateurs d'adultes d'ajouter à sa chronologie et de poser des questions d'histoire susceptibles de nous aider à comprendre le rôle que «l'apprentissage a joué dans l'orientation et l'enrichissement du développement des individus, hommes ou femmes. » Cet article tente de relever ce défi et offre une explication du développement de la formation permanente dans un contexte particulier. L'examen de ce contexte, constitué par les développements historiques et sociaux du 19 siècle et du début du 20 siècle, porte une attention toute particulière aux développements et à la marginalisation de la formation permanente non-institutionnelle. Le contexte social, religieux, philosophique et historique de la formation permanente non-institutionnelle met en relief le cadre contextuel intégré à la formation permanente et fait apparaître un mouvement composé d'organismes bénévoles qui ont poursuivi une énorme entreprise d'éducation informelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it