MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1505518766

Semiclassical Analysis of Quarter Stadium Billiards

2006· article· zh· W1505518766 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
徐学友, 高嵩, 郭文豪, 张延惠, 林圣路

Bibliographic record

Venue中国物理快报:英文版 · 2006
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStadiumSemiclassical physicsQuarter (Canadian coin)MathematicsPhysicsGeographyGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

为静止状态的一个扩大方法被使用获得特徵函数和 1/4 个体育场台球的 eigenenergies,并且它的最近的 energy-levelspacing 分发被获得。直方图与标准 Wigner 分发一致,它显示体育场台球系统是混乱的。特别注意对追求如此的古典混乱的量表明被给予。在量系列和古典轨道的 Fouriertransformation 之间的通讯被使用 closed-orbittheory 调查。分析、数字的结果与要求的分辨率一致,它支持半古典作品方法提供一幅身体上有意义的图象理解如此的混乱系统。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue中国物理快报:英文版Same topicQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsFrench-language works237,207