MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1505582044 · doi:10.15353/joci.v3i3.2363

La Promoción de las TIC para el Desarrollo en Pueblos Indígenas: Extensión o Comunicación

2007· article· es· W1505582044 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sofía Irene Medellin Urquiaga, Erick Huerta Velázquez

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Community Informatics · 2007
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicE-Learning and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A partir de la pregunta planteada por Paolo Freire en su ensayo ¿Extensión o Comunicación? (1976). El artículo examina el proceso en que el desarrollo de las TIC ha sido instrumentado por algunas políticas gubernamentales en Latinoamérica ¿Ha sido este un proceso extensionista, que impone una forma de entender la realidad sobre otra; o un proceso de comunicación, guiado por un diálogo recíproco que permita a las comunidades definir las ventajas y utilidades de la incorporación de las TIC en su vida cotidiana?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.020
Scholarly communication0.0140.010
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Community InformaticsSame topicE-Learning and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207