Itaipu e a Bacia do Prata: dos conflitos à integração - Argentina, Brasil e Paraguai
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper wills to show the influence of the Itaipu hydroelectric plant in the power relations of the Plata Basin, particularly the relationsof Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay.For it is made a ransom of most relevant historical events in international relations of the three countries.Is also presented the way that the platinum region fits into the Latin American context, especially with regard to foreign policy.Itaipu is explored in various contexts (politicaldiplomatic, economic, social, etc.) and the project since its initial idea, with the -Ata das Cataratas‖, until its operation in the beginning of the XXI century is included in the paper.Major changes in political and economic contexts that occurred in the region, such as the transition to democracy, are also present in the analysis as a fundamental factor of the paradigm shift observed.The Platinum Relations that were historically marked by relative equilibrium in the balance of power, between Argentina and Brazil, are faced with the detachment of Brazil as a predominant country.Itaipu arises in this context, increasing even more the conflicts, at first.The project is shown as a key element in the consolidation of Brazilian dominance and after is possible to see their collaboration in the movement that went from confrontation to cooperation, and finally integration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".