MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1505612098 · doi:10.1029/2009rs004254

Dispersion relation and group velocity for inhomogeneous waves in a hot magnetoplasma with application to an electron-Bernstein-wave propagation experiment in a laboratory plasma

2010· article· en· W1505612098 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadio Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDispersion relationPhysicsWave propagationPlane waveDispersion (optics)Wave vectorGroup velocityComputational physicsRectilinear propagationLongitudinal waveMechanical waveQuantum electrodynamicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[1] Lewis and Keller (1962) derive the dispersion relation for homogeneous waves propagating in a hot magnetoplasma. Homogeneous waves are ones for which the real and imaginary parts of the wave vector, kr and ki, are parallel. In this paper a generalization to Lewis and Keller is made for inhomogeneous waves, that is, waves for which kr and ki are not parallel. If ki is assumed to be in the same plane as kr and the magnetic field H0 in the Lewis and Keller generalization, comparison can be made with the dispersion relation of Stix (1992); good agreement is found with one exception. This generalization is applied to observations of electrostatic (ES) wave propagation in a laboratory plasma. Bernstein waves propagating perpendicular to H0 are undamped. The dispersion relation for homogeneous waves indicates that severe damping should occur for propagation slightly off perpendicular. Laboratory experiments indicate that severe damping does not occur. The laboratory results can be explained if inhomogeneous waves are considered. Muldrew and Gonfalone (1974) used the dispersion equation for homogeneous waves in a hot magnetoplasma to explain the signal maxima in the pattern when electron-Bernstein waves interfere with the electromagnetic field. Good agreement is obtained when ki is small compared to kr. However, when ki becomes significant, the pattern can no longer be explained. Different approaches to explaining the results using inhomogeneous waves are presented that are superior to the one using homogeneous waves. In one approach, plasma waves with a complex wave vector can propagate without large attenuation, and propagation characteristics can be determined, by choosing the direction of ki to be a free parameter that makes Im{k · vg} = 0, or have a minimum value; k = kr + iki, vg is the complex group velocity ∂ω/∂k and ω is the real angular wave frequency. When this condition is satisfied, good agreement in the signal maxima is obtained with the laboratory experiments if the direction of energy flow in the plasma is taken to be Re{vg}. This method of calculating the interference pattern is compared with the least damped method which calculates the potential of an oscillating point charge in a plasma. Good agreement between the two methods is found if an assumption is made regarding the wave(s) interfering with the ES Bernstein mode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it