MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1505739892 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2005.1556308

Comparison of a SOM based sequence analysis system and naive Bayesian classifier for spam filtering

2006· article· en· W1505739892 on OpenAlexaff
Xiao Luo, A. Nur Zincir‐Heywood

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005. · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpam and Phishing Detection
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNaive Bayes classifierClassifier (UML)Artificial intelligenceBayesian probabilitySequence (biology)Machine learningFilter (signal processing)Data miningPattern recognition (psychology)Bag-of-words modelSupport vector machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem introduced by the unsolicited bulk emails, also known as "spam" generates a need for reliable anti-spam filters. In this paper, we design and compare the performance of a newly designed SOM based sequence analysis (SBSA) system for the spam filtering task. The system is based on a SOM based sequential data representation combined with a kNN classifier designed to make use of word sequence information. We compare this system with the traditional baseline method naive Bayesian filter. Three different cost scenarios and suitable cost-sensitive measurements are employed. The results show that the SBSA system is superior to the naive Bayesian filter, particularly when the misclassification cost for non-spam message is high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005.Same topicSpam and Phishing DetectionFrench-language works237,207