MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1505765105 · doi:10.7202/1003490ar

Prométhéa moderne. Création, rébellion et pouvoir dans le roman féminin

2011· article· fr· W1505765105 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Catherine Nesci, Kathryne Adair

Bibliographic record

VenueTangence · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À partir des récits de création qui mettent en jeu la figure de Prométhée au xix e siècle, cet essai se penche sur la féminisation du mythe de George Sand à Rachilde. Centrée sur le roman Méphis de Flora Tristan et sur Monsieur Vénus de Rachilde, l’enquête cible la manière dont les romancières ont mis en oeuvre l’imaginaire mythique qu’incarne le Prométhée moderne de Mary Shelley et les modes selon lesquels leurs textes représentent la création de l’humain et la différence des sexes. Voleuses de feu et démiurges modernes, les romancières pensent également la libération du personnage féminin et remettent en question une culture centrée sur la norme masculine. La réflexion porte sur le pouvoir féminin en se fondant sur la critique des institutions sociales qui s’exprime à travers la dynamique amoureuse mise en scène dans ces romans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTangenceSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207