MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1505864015 · doi:10.3917/drs.081.0343

Harcèlement psychologique au travail : entre psychologisation et victimisation

2012· article· fr· W1505864015 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rachel Cox

Bibliographic record

VenueDroit et société · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au Québec, la Loi sur les normes du travail reconnaît le droit de la personne salariée à un milieu de travail exempt de harcèlement psychologique. Le recours de la personne syndiquée est le dépôt d’un grief. La lecture des décisions arbitrales révèle un langage parfois plus psychologique que juridique, surtout associé au rejet des griefs. Ce langage traduit un regard sévère sur les personnes qui portent plainte, faisant porter l’enquête sur le caractère « normal » de leur personnalité et la présence d’une maladie mentale chez elles. La tendance à une lecture psychologisante des griefs pour harcèlement a pour effet d’écarter l’analyse sociale et organisationnelle des milieux de travail. L’intention du législateur était pourtant d’assainir les milieux de travail par un examen critique de l’organisation du travail et de l’exercice du droit de gérance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDroit et sociétéSame topicHistorical and Scientific StudiesFrench-language works237,207