Hip Arthroplasty in Highly Dislocated Hips
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Developmental disorder of the hip (DDH) is the most frequent disease of this joint. It is manifested by dysplasia, subluxation or luxation in childhood period and arthrosis in adults. Early degenerative changes of the hip occur at the location of disordered anatomy and biomechanics already in youth, while in the childhood age they are mostly asymptomatic (Ando & Gotoh, 1990). DDH mostly occurs in females, even 4-10 times more often than in males. Also, the disease is unevenly expanded, both ethnically and geographically, but also according to different habits in regard to the nursing care of neonates and infants. For example, the disease does not develop among the Bantu colored population, while in Canadian Indians it is very frequent rating even 12.3%, which is related to their habit of nursing babies in narrow wooden cradles. In those Indians who do not practice it the frequency is considerably lower (1.2%) (Vukasinovic et al., 1994, 2004). In our regions data on the frequency of DDH vary between 0.5-34.8%, depending on the regional customs in nursing children, but also on the method applied in the diagnostics of the disease; clinically it is the lowest, radiographically higher, and ultrasonographically the highest (Klisic et al., 1984). Former classical term of the disease was “congenital dislocation of the hip”, which, over the years became unsustainable, since it has been disclosed that the disease is not congenital, but that it often develops after birth under the influence of environmental factors. In addition, it does not always involve a total dislocation, but only disturbed interrelationship among the joint surfaces of the hip. Although the former term can be still found in the literature, today the term “developmental disorder of the hip” is accepted worldwide (Klisic, 1989).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".