MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1506078632 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2014.281410

Hook, line and sinker: adult zebrafish offer a valid model to study mammalian cardiac contractile mechanics

2014· letter· en· W1506078632 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Lakin, Stephen P. Wright, Nazari Polidovitch

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZebrafishMyofilamentSarcomereCardiac myocyteCardiac function curveCardiovascular physiologyMyocyteCardiac muscleBiologyCell biologyChemistryAnatomyInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineGeneticsHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On a beat-to-beat basis, cardiac contractile function is driven by a multifaceted and dynamic process that is regulated by both intrinsic (e.g. mechanical loading) and extrinsic (e.g. neuro-hormonal) factors (de Tombe et al. 2010). Specifically, the level of contractile activation of adult mammalian cardiomyocytes is modulated by the magnitude of the Ca2+ transient, the dynamic activation–relaxation kinetic response of the sarcomere to activator Ca2+ and the responsiveness of the myofilament to Ca2+, the last of which is dependent on sarcomere length and is a primary mediator of the Frank–Starling response. While transgenic mouse models have provided important insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying cardiac contractile function in health and disease, they are associated with high cost and relatively long generation times. Recently, the zebrafish has emerged as a promising model for the study of cardiac structure–function relationships, due to short generation times, ease of genetic manipulation and low cost. While multiple studies have characterized zebrafish cardiac electrophysiology, Ca2+ dynamics and myofilament mechanical function, it remains unclear whether the cardiac contractile structure–function relationship of adult zebrafish is comparable to that of the mammalian system. In a recent issue of The Journal of Physiology, Dvornikov et al. (2014) sought to determine whether adult zebrafish cardiac contractile physiology and structure–function relationship are comparable to that of the mammalian system. Using a novel carbon rod-based approach to study the contractile function of single, enzymatically isolated zebrafish ventricular myocytes, Dvornikov et al. (2014) used a sequential approach to characterize cardiac contractile mechanics. Specifically, the following two modes of contraction were studied to characterize the extrinsic and intrinsic factors regulating force production: (i) electrically stimulated twitches in mechanically loaded membrane-intact myocytes; and (ii) Ca2+-activated contractions in chemically permeabilized cells. The authors demonstrated that in the absence of change in intracellular Ca2+, twitch force increased in response to sarcomere stretch, with maximal Ca2+-saturated force increasing with sarcomere length. Furthermore, contractility was shown to respond to increases in extracellular Ca2+ concentrations in a dose-dependent manner. In chemically permeabilized cells, steady-state force development increased sigmoidally as a function of activating [Ca2+]. These findings suggest that the Frank–Starling response and its cellular correlate, myofilament length-dependent activation, are an intrinsic property and critical mediator of contractile function of both mammalian and zebrafish cardiomyocytes. Using a rapid solution-switching technique, sarcomere Ca2+ activation–relaxation and force redevelopment kinetics were examined to determine the dynamic response of the sarcomere to activator Ca2+. It was revealed that the kinetic characteristics of single zebrafish myofibrils were similar to those of mammalian myofibrils. Taken together, these findings provide evidence that the regulation of contractile function and structure–function relationships in the zebrafish heart are similar to those of the mammalian heart, suggesting that the zebrafish represents a valid model system for the study of mammalian cardiac contractile mechanics. The use of novel carbon fibre-based approaches, as used by Dvornikov et al. (2014), has allowed for unprecedented study of active and passive cardiomyocyte force–length and force–Ca2+ relationships. Isolated intact cardiomyocytes have the benefit of being independent of connective tissue and endothelium, allowing for the isolation of contractile properties and assessment of subcellular mechanisms to a greater degree compared with intact tissue preparations. The sequential approach used in the study by Dvornikov et al. (2014) allowed the authors to comprehensively assess zebrafish ventricular cardiomyocyte contractile physiology and the regulation of twitch force production. As force development is intimately dependent on the magnitude of the Ca2+ transient and sarcomere length, the finding of twitch force modulation by extracellular [Ca2+] and sarcomere length in the isolated intact zebrafish myocyte is important for model validation and future translational application. Specifically, the robust myofilament length-dependent activation exhibited by zebrafish ventricular myocytes suggests that this model may help to identify the cellular basis of this phenomenon. Mammalian myofilament length-dependent activation has been extensively studied, but the mechanisms responsible remain unclear, with multiple integrated pathways, including interfilament lattice spacing and post-translational modification of sarcomeric proteins, thought to contribute. Recent work suggests that the length dependence of thin filament Ca2+ co-operativity, which reflects the increasing steepness of force development as a function of [Ca2+], may contribute to myofilament length-dependent activation in mammalian cardiomyocytes (Farman et al. 2010). However, the absence of this finding in the study by Dvornikov et al. (2014) and in previous work in rodents (Dobesh et al. 2002) highlights the unresolved complexity of the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. Notwithstanding, the relative ease of genetic manipulation in zebrafish and the conservation of the structure of critical domains of several sarcomeric proteins suggest that the zebrafish will be invaluable for future studies assessing the molecular basis of length-dependent activation and resolving the disparate findings that exist between studies. While the study by Dvornikov et al. (2014) focused on the characterization of zebrafish ventricular cardiomyocyte contractile function, the integration of isolated cardiomyocytes and whole-heart function in this model system may be limited. The intrinsic mechanical properties of isolated cardiomyocytes are directly responsible for many of the active and passive (e.g. contraction and relaxation) properties of the whole heart. Arguments against the utility of the zebrafish as a model to study human-related health and disease include its ectothermal regulation of body temperature and two-chamber heart morphology. Furthermore, the absence of the t-tubular system and limited contribution of the sarcoplasmic reticulum to Ca2+ homeostasis in ventricular cardiomyocytes (Verkerk & Remme, 2012), both of which are key components of excitation–contraction coupling in mammalian cardiomyocytes, suggest that significant mechanistic differences exist between mammalian and zebrafish cardiomyocytes in the control of cytosolic [Ca2+] and cardiac contractility. This is further supported by the absence of the slow force response in the study by Dvornikov et al. (2014), which, in addition to the Frank–Starling response, is an important regulator of cardiac contractility. Ultimately, these findings may preclude the use of zebrafish myocardium for integrative assessments of contractile mechanics and cardiac reserve, the latter of which is important to characterize cardiomyocyte responsiveness to physiological and pathological stress stimuli. The zebrafish may therefore be better suited to the study of isolated components of excitation–contraction coupling and the contractile apparatus, with the study by Dvornikov et al. (2014) providing support for this assertion. Although the focus of the study by Dvornikov et al. (2014) is the validation of the zebrafish as a model for mammalian contractile mechanics, the zebrafish has considerable value as a model for several areas of cardiovascular interest. The similarities between mammalian and zebrafish action potential properties in ventricular cardiomyocytes have made the zebrafish an ideal model for the study of ion channel mutations and the functional effects of electrophysiological abnormalities (Brette et al. 2008). Furthermore, the closed-loop zebrafish cardiovascular system makes for a useful model for cardiovascular developmental biology because it includes similar steps to mammals, with early progenitor cell specification, differentiation and migration, followed by formation of the myocardium and valves and development of the conduction system and pacemaker. Abnormal development may also be modelled, allowing for the study of congenital heart disease, including structural and electrophysiological defects. The majority of congenital heart diseases have a genetic basis, but the role of genetic regulation in cardiovascular developmental disease remains incompletely understood. As the zebrafish genome has been sequenced fully and is publicly available, it is commonly used for both forward and reverse genetic screens, contributing to the identification of candidate genes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (Arnaout et al. 2007) which may underlie cardiovascular developmental abnormalities. However, the aforementioned two-chamber physiology as well as a lack of pulmonary circulation limits the ability of zebrafish to model integrated cardiovascular development completely. The zebrafish model has also been used to examine molecular mechanisms underlying the pathological progression of numerous human cardiac diseases, most notably intrinsic disorders of the myocardium, including cardiomyopathies. Intrinsic cardiomyopathies are caused by familial and spontaneous mutations in sarcomeric contractile proteins, ion channels, signalling proteins, etc. It should be noted, however, that mutations in sarcomeric contractile proteins are the most prominent cause of intrinsic cardiomyopathies. These mutations disrupt normal sarcomeric protein organization, cardiomyocyte stretch sensing and excitation–contraction coupling, ultimately leading to progressive decompensation of cardiac contractile function as well as enhanced susceptibility to malignant cardiac arrhythmias. The use of transgenic zebrafish models therefore allows for the manipulation of molecular components of the contractile apparatus and contributes to a better understanding of the genetic factors and molecular modifications that underlie human cardiac disease. For example, mybpc3 gene knockdown in the zebrafish was shown to result in structural, functional and electrophysiological abnormalities characteristic of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and has been used to study the susceptibility of the hypertrophied heart to Ca2+ and voltage alternans (Chen et al. 2013). Ultimately, this will allow for the development of novel therapies, including targeted gene delivery, which may eventually complement or replace current pharmacotherapies. In this context, the zebrafish may prove to be a useful model. In conclusion, Dvornikov et al. (2014) have used a novel carbon fibre-based approach to show that the zebrafish offers a valid model system for the study of mammalian cardiac contractile physiology and cellular structure–function relationships. The zebrafish offers a promising and advantageous model that will contribute significantly to knowledge about the molecular mechanisms of mammalian cardiac contractile regulation, offering insight into the functional consequences of genetic manipulation and therapeutic strategies in human health and disease. None declared. None declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physiology→Same topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies→French-language works237,207→