MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1506102548 · doi:10.1300/j482v12n01_04

Managers' Perceptions of Export Barriers

2006· article· en· W1506102548 on OpenAlexaff
David J. Smith, Philippe Grégoire, Mandy Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transnational Management · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Business and FDI
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCredenceBusinessPerceptionLogistic regressionExport performanceIdentification (biology)Principal (computer security)MarketingIndustrial organization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exports continue to be one of the fastest-growing economic activities in our world today. However, the rate at which countries develop substantial levels of export activity appears to vary. Firm-level decisions regarding export initiation are motivated in part by the perceptions of management, leading to the principal question of this study. Do managers of exporting firms in India perceive different export obstacles to those in the United States? In an examination of 255 Indian and American engineering firms, logistic regression and other significance testing is performed to identify any differences in export barrier variables. Findings indicate that there are in fact differences in manager perceptions of export barriers between the firms from each country lending credence to differing export activity levels. Furthermore, identification of specific variables allow for the formulation of both firm and public policy in an effort to mitigate the impact of these variables on export initiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Transnational ManagementSame topicInternational Business and FDIFrench-language works237,207