MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1506105818

Hipogeos funerarios del Bronce Pleno en Torre Velha 3 (Serpa, Portugal).

2011· article· es· W1506105818 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Catarina Alves, Catarina Costeira, Susana Estrela, Eduardo Porfírio, Miguel Serra, António M. Monge Soares, Marta Moreno García

Bibliographic record

VenueGredos (University of Salamanca) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Geological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotteryArchaeologyCaveRadiocarbon datingExcavationChronologyQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyOpen airAncient historyPortugueseGrave goodsArtHistoryEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recientes intervenciones arqueológicas realizadas en el Bajo Alentejo (Portugal), en el ámbito del Proyecto de Alqueva (EDIA), han permitido la identificación de importantes vestigios del Bronce del Sudoeste. En este artículo se presentan los primeros datos de uno de los mayores conjuntos de hipogeos funerarios de esa época, excavado en el yacimiento de Torre Velha 3 (Serpa), que muestra claras semejanzas con el mundo argárico, sobre todo en los rituales, en la arquitectura y en el ajuar ofrendado. Así, los hipogeos están formados por un atrio, que puede tener diversas formas y que da acceso a una se encuentran generalmente en la cámara, y se acompañan de artefactos cerámicos y metálicos y de ofrendas cárnicas, lo que constituye un indicio de la realización de rituales de comensalidad con ocasión de los en- tierros. La datación por radiocarbono de muestra óseas pertenecientes a las ofrendas de carne permitió asignar a estos hipogeos una cronología dentro del segundo cuarto/inicios del tercero del II Milenio a.C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.135 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGredos (University of Salamanca)Same topicArchaeological and Geological StudiesFrench-language works237,207