MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1506154726 · doi:10.1002/wrna.1176

<scp>ALREX</scp>‐elements and introns: two identity elements that promote <scp>mRNA</scp> nuclear export

2013· review· en· W1506154726 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexander F. Palazzo, Kohila Mahadevan, Stefan P. Tarnawsky

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews - RNA · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNuclear export signalRNA splicingIntronMessenger RNABiologyRNARibonucleoproteinCell biologyGeneticsRNase PAU-rich elementGeneRNA-binding proteinComputational biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanisms that dictate whether a particular mRNA is exported from the nucleus are still poorly defined. However, it has become increasingly clear that these mechanisms act to promote the expression of protein-coding mRNAs over the high levels of spurious transcription that is endemic to most eukaryotic genomes. For example, mRNA processing events that are associated with protein-coding transcripts, such as splicing, act as mRNA identity elements that promote nuclear export of these transcripts. Six years ago, we made the serendipitous discovery that regions within the open reading frame of an mRNA that encode short secretory or mitochondrial-targeting peptides can also act as an mRNA identity element which promotes an alternative mRNA nuclear export (ALREX) pathway. These regions are enriched in protein coding genes and have particular features that can be used to identify this class of protein-coding mRNA. In this article we review our current knowledge of how mRNA export evolved in response to particular events that occurred at the base of the eukaryotic tree. We will then focus on our current understanding of ALREX and compare its features to splicing-dependent export, the main mRNA export pathway in metazoans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews - RNASame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207