MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1506166368 · doi:10.1109/iscas.1994.408961

A new technique for the exact design of high-quality LDI Jaumann digital filters

2002· article· en· W1506166368 on OpenAlexaff
B. Nowrouzian, L.M. Smith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLossless compressionHigh-pass filterIntegratorDigital filterBand-pass filterMathematicsFilter (signal processing)Low-pass filterNetwork synthesis filtersPrototype filterComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmTopology (electrical circuits)Electronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceData compressionBandwidth (computing)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new technique is presented for the exact design and synthesis of high-quality lossless discrete-integrator (LDI) Jaumann digital filters. The proposed technique is based on the development of a discrete-time prototype reference filter derived such that it permits the main important steps in the Jaumann digital filter synthesis to be performed directly in the discrete-time z-domain in terms of the LDI monomial. The resulting Jaumann digital filters are capable of realizing lowpass (LP), highpass (HP), bandpass (BP), and bandstop (BS) transfer functions, and are minimal in the number of the required digital multiplication and canonical in the number of the required unit-delay operations. In addition, the corresponding HP and BS realizations are completely free from the stability problems stemming from the pole-zero cancellation at half sample-frequency which is inherent in the existing LDI digital filters realizations.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207