MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1506189662

Mutual coupling and sensitivity investigations of SIW-based antipodal linear tapered slot antennas in 1-D and 2-D array configurations

2013· article· en· W1506189662 on OpenAlex
Farzaneh Taringou, T. Weiland, Jens Børnemann

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Conference on Antennas and Propagation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntipodal pointCoupling (piping)BroadbandSensitivity (control systems)Antenna (radio)Return lossSlot antennaPermittivityMaterials scienceOpticsDirectional antennaOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringPhysicsTelecommunicationsComputer scienceEngineeringDielectricMathematicsGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive study of the impacts of mutual coupling in computationally expensive antenna arrays is presented. Single- and dual-polarized antipodal linear tapered slot antennas (ALTSAs), which are fed by coplanar waveguides (CPWs) and substrate integrated waveguides (SIWs), are arranged in 1-D and 2-D array configurations, operating between 21 GHz and 31 GHz. The influence of mutual coupling and element spacing sensitivity on radiation properties as well as return loss performances in 1-D and 2-D arrays are presented and discussed. The broadband performance of the individual array antenna element on low-permittivity substrate is verified by measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it