Paleoecology of an Interglacial Peat Deposit, Nuyakuk, Southwestern Alaska, U.S.A.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports the presence of interglacial beetle and pollen assemblages within a Pleistocene peat deposit exposed along the Nuyakuk River of southwestern Alaska. The fossil beetle assemblages contain a number of species not previously identified from eastern Beringian fossil assemblages. The Nuyakuk interglacial deposits are exposed within a 6-m-high terrace along the river, about 4 km beyond the moraine of the penultimate glaciation. Interglacial peat lies within the lowermost meter of the bluff and is overlain by fluvial gravel and loess. Insect fossils were extracted from five peat samples, yielding sixty-seven identified beetle taxa. The insect faunal diversity of the Nuyakuk assemblages is comparable to that found in regional Holocene peat samples. In contrast to assemblages of similar age from interior eastern Beringia, the Nuyakuk fauna contains significant numbers of aquatic, hygrophilous and riparian taxa. Four pollen samples from the Nuyakuk site were analyzed, providing spectra dominated by a few taxa, notably Alnus, Betula, Picea, Gramineae, Cyperaceae, Filicales, and Sphagnum, suggesting a rich alder-birch shrub tundra not much different from the modern regional vegetation. The pollen and insect fossil records also suggest climatic conditions similar to modern.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".