On Rule of Law in Governmental Cooperation for Regional Economic Integration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Currently, economic globalization and regional economic integration are both in function, and as an international and regional varying factor, they profoundly influence and constrain the socio-economic development of all countries. In China, “to promote the regional economic integration in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, in the Yangtze Delta, and in the Pearl River Delta” has been stipulated in China’s Economic and Social Development of the Twelfth Five Year Plan Outline. Governmental cooperation is the inevitable choice in enhancing harmonic regional economic development under regional economic integration, and the fundamental requirement of governmental administration in the transfer of administrative regional economy to the territorial economy. To ensure the continuity, steadiness and optimal effect of governmental cooperation, law must be implemented to study the various potential legal problems so as to construct a strong legal operation system to guarantee the essential coordinative legitimate mechanism and provide excellent legal environment for the regional economic development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.062 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.020 | 0.018 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".