MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1506292443

The cost of switching Internet providers in the French broadband industry, or why ADSL has diffused faster than other innovative technologies

2006· preprint· en· W1506292443 on OpenAlexaff
Evens Salies, Jackie Krafft

Bibliographic record

VenueSPIRE (Sciences Po) · 2006
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsAsymmetric digital subscriber lineBroadbandBusinessThe InternetTelecommunicationsCable modemInternet accessDigital subscriber lineComputer scienceWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper focuses on the innovative French broadband Internet industry that is\ncharacterised by inertia phenomena in terms of technology choice. We argue that\nalthough inertia on the supply side helps to explain the faster diffusion of ADSL, a more\ncomplete picture can be obtained when we consider the existence of costs faced by\ncustomers when switching between Internet Service Providers (ISPs). We calculate\nthese so-called “switching costs” and conclude that they act as a barrier to customers' mobility, thus bringing about a dominance of the technology supplied by the largest firm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPIRE (Sciences Po)Same topicICT Impact and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207