Bibliographic record
Abstract
Available data indicate that peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers some advantages for the increasing number of elderly patients with ESRD, such as hemodynamic stability, steady-state metabolic control, good control of hypertension, independence from hospital visits, and avoidance of repeated vascular access. Early referral promotes the establishment of peritoneal access and minimizes the consequences of uremia and subsequent morbidity and frequent hospitalization. Elderly patients have similar modality-related complications such as peritonitis, catheter-related complications, exit-site and tunnel infection, and hernias as younger patients. Comorbid conditions, malnutrition, and psychosocial status influence the survival of elderly patients on PD. Elderly patients are compliant and highly motivated to cooperate in treatment. They are more tolerant of changes and losses and have a greater sense of well-being, less illness and modality-related stress, and fewer mood disturbances. Despite comorbid conditions, that significantly impair self-performance of dialysis, PD can be performed successfully if they have family support or access to a network of medical and social support, that is, home nurses, rehabilitation services, and chronic care dialysis units, or nursing homes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".