Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the early eighteenth century India was still a land of porous frontiers and tremendous opportunities, as it was when the Europeans first discovered it in the sixteenth century. Notwithstanding France's defeat in India after the fall of Pondicherry in 1793, which left the British East India Company free to consolidate and extend its influence in India, there still remained ‘border zones’ in India which offered the French and other Europeans chances to cross cultural frontiers, amass wealth and spend it. However, by the middle of the nineteenth century when the British had established control in India and the Indian Ocean, and the local rulers had been firmly subjugated to British colonial power, such spaces with permeable borders became rare and opportunities for individuals to engage in cultural crossings and financially successful enterprises with locals were greatly reduced. Through a reading of the representations of Pondicherry, Mauritius and Lucknow, this study reviews the presence of such border zones between the imagined spaces of France, Britain and India.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it